Tags:
Hi Greg
We have used the auto nozzles down in our part of the world in the past, only to revert back to constant flow (apart from booster lines and aerial/deck nozzles). The reason for this is that the nozzle man has no control over the flow rate with the auto nozzles. A hose line can be flowing the maximum output of the nozzle one minute, and the minimum the next, without the MPO or nozzle operator knowing. The flow rate on those things can vary immensly and they take all available water at their operating pressure. When a second line is opened some of the 1st line's flow is diverted into that. When a 3rd is opened the same happens etc. This can mean a nozzle operator, who may be dealing with a large developing fire, may suddenly have a reduced flow at his nozzle due to another opening up, without any noticeable change in the pump or hose line pressure to enable the MPO to compensate.
A way of overcoming these issues to have flow gauges on the hose line outlets so the MPO can regulate flow with the pump speed. We don't have these so we went back to constant flow nozzles for hose lines so an increased flow demand creates a pressure drop that can be compensated and nozzle operators have a constant flow to work with.
Hope this helps. I'd be interested to hear more about break apart if you have any info on it (pressures / flows etc).
Mike D
I prefer smooth bore nozzles over "automatic" nozzles any day of the week for interior attack due to simplicity, reliability, low operating pressures, and gpm delivery. We all know that in order to combat BTU's we need GPM's and not PSI's. The automatic nozzles are not constant in regards to flow. The nozzle can go from optimum to minumum flow in seconds with no warning to the attack team. Fire flow is simple math it is not rocket science. Nozzle salesmen want to keep complicating this for us in order to sell nozzles. The smoothbore nozzle is the oldest nozzle in the fire service for a reason...It works!
The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.
Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.
For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.
We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.
Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.
Check out the most recent episode and schedule of UPCOMING PODCASTS
45 members
116 members
62 members
73 members
166 members
65 members
277 members
510 members
10 members
106 members
© 2024 Created by fireeng. Powered by
FE Home | Product Center | Training | Zones | Fire-EMS | Firefighting | Apparatus | Health/Safety | Leadership | Prevention | Rescue |