Fire Engineering Training Community

Where firefighters come to talk training

Lot's of discussion/conflict on the SLICE-RS concept, which I think is great. Conflict/discussion is a necessary indicator of change. Without it, everything remains the same. Although, some of the who-ha is inaccurate. Not picking on this guy. It just happens to be the example of the day. A few facts that might be helpful: 

1) Rescue remains the highest priority of the fire department. We're every bit as aggressive on rescue as ever; I'd argue more aggressive and more effective. We simply moved the "R" to indicate flexibility. (You'd think we placed the "R" right next to the cheese.) The basic concept is when you're ahead of the water, lean towards VEIS. When you're behind the water, lean towards traditional primary and secondary search. And this is a rule of thumb, dependent on the situation. But rescue is still job #1. Always has been, always will be. Anyone claiming otherwise is, well...."blowing smoke," or misinformed. 

2) We don't always hit it from the outside first, and never said anything about for how long. We ran 3 fires yesterday, none of which called for exterior cooling prior to entry. It depends on the conditions. We tell our guys/gals to cool it until conditions improve. That's their call based on what they have at the time. Any references to time came from somewhere else. But when we have high heat and it, from wherever makes sense. Might be outside, might be inside...just depends. But use the water! Water makes fire better!

3) Stream and application technique matters. We are forever reinforcing "how" to apply water. Straight or solid streams applied directly in the heated compartments without the "whipping" stuff is the preferred to minimize disruption of the thermal balance. 

I encourage everyone to make sure they are working with the facts and not the internet drama and distraction. While I often get a good "LOL," I question the contributions to moving the fire service forward, in whatever direction that may be. There's a difference between meaningful questions and debate, and stirring stuff based on emotion and inaccurate information. Again, not picking on this guy. Just speaking in general terms. 

So let the debate continue! Good stuff!

Views: 5563


You need to be a member of Fire Engineering Training Community to add comments!

Join Fire Engineering Training Community

Policy Page


The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.


Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.

For vetted content, please go to

We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.  

Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail

FE Podcasts

Check out the most recent episode and schedule of


© 2024   Created by fireeng.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service