116 members
356 members
115 members
258 members
602 members
The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.
Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.
For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.
We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.
Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.
Check out the most recent episode and schedule of UPCOMING PODCASTS
76 members
84 members
180 members
74 members
330 members
614 members
13 members
123 members
16 members
411 members
© 2023 Created by fireeng.
Powered by
Home | Product Center | Training | Zones | EMS | Firefighting | Apparatus | Health/Safety | Leadership | Prevention | Rescue | Community | Mobile |
Comment Wall (32 comments)
You need to be a member of Fire Engineering Training Community to add comments!
Join Fire Engineering Training Community
Been reading your department's "Nozzle Project", very, very good stuff. What has occurred since that would affect your results? Anything? We're developing plans to give 2 1/2" lines its proper place on our engines again, and I'm looking for the right argument to sway opinions about smooth bores as well. (By the way, the push for this started at the Seattle Convention class in '08)
Later, Scott
Thanks for the add.
That through the lock simulator beside you in the picture... is that home made?
Stay Safe,
Andrew
This was a beautiful moment. Someone was watching and posted it for us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xV2cjRd-e8
View All Comments