54 members
356 members
23 members
160 members
14 members
The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.
Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.
For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.
We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.
Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.
Check out the most recent episode and schedule of UPCOMING PODCASTS
180 members
74 members
330 members
614 members
13 members
123 members
16 members
411 members
83 members
6 members
© 2023 Created by fireeng.
Powered by
Home | Product Center | Training | Zones | EMS | Firefighting | Apparatus | Health/Safety | Leadership | Prevention | Rescue | Community | Mobile |
Comment Wall (7 comments)
You need to be a member of Fire Engineering Training Community to add comments!
Join Fire Engineering Training Community
Need some mutual aid on CAFS. Do you guys have a minimum CAFS flow for hand lines? We did some tests today and could not meet our minimum flow (150 GPM) with a "wet" CAFS line that the crews were comfortable with. We did get a good stream and manageable line at 130 GPM. This is probably adequate under most conditions, but the confined, pre-flashover fire might be another story.
I know you guys have done a lot of work on this so I'm wondering if you ever wrote it down in policy form?
Any help is appreciated!
Sean
Scott