Fire Engineering Training Community

Where firefighters come to talk training

Mike Walker's Discussions (77)

Discussions Replied To (13) Replies Latest Activity

"Some of our rigs are using a form of this load on their pre-connects. It has pro's a…"

Mike Walker replied Oct 17, 2009 to "Cleveland Load"

12 Jun 6, 2014
Reply by Mark Lee

"Bigger then the one on that line. Why? One to put out a fire that was obviously too…"

Mike Walker replied Jul 2, 2009 to Which nozzle for fashover?

39 Jan 13, 2012
Reply by Timothy Patrick

"Hey Joe I strongly recommend 2 1/2" hose for Standpipe kits for several reasons, le…"

Mike Walker replied May 7, 2009 to 2 1/2 in the High Rise Pack??

10 May 16, 2009

"Great information! In Okla. City we employ a tactic that we call an "apartment lay.…"

Mike Walker replied Nov 8, 2008 to Beyond The Pre-connect

21 Nov 8, 2008
Reply by Art Zern

"I am very curious as to how many others have experienced the same problems you have…"

Mike Walker replied Oct 23, 2008 to Smoothbore Vs Fog/Automatic for Standpipes

42 Dec 31, 2008
Reply by L. Chapel

"George, I am afraid you may be failing to realize many of us use Flashover simulato…"

Mike Walker replied Oct 22, 2008 to Smoothbore Vs Fog/Automatic for Standpipes

42 Dec 31, 2008
Reply by L. Chapel

"If this department even existed.... let's say they purchased TFT 2 1/2" slug tip noz…"

Mike Walker replied Oct 18, 2008 to Smoothbore Vs Fog/Automatic for Standpipes

42 Dec 31, 2008
Reply by L. Chapel

"Okay, let's just say there were a hypothetical situation where a well intentioned FD…"

Mike Walker replied Oct 16, 2008 to Smoothbore Vs Fog/Automatic for Standpipes

42 Dec 31, 2008
Reply by L. Chapel

"Thanks for the information brother. You're handy to have around"

Mike Walker replied Oct 16, 2008 to Smoothbore Vs Fog/Automatic for Standpipes

42 Dec 31, 2008
Reply by L. Chapel

"Russ, We have recenlty purchased 1 1/4" smoothbores for our High-Rise Kits. However…"

Mike Walker replied Oct 16, 2008 to Smoothbore Vs Fog/Automatic for Standpipes

42 Dec 31, 2008
Reply by L. Chapel

RSS

Policy Page

PLEASE NOTE

The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.

CONTRIBUTORS NOTE

Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.

For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.

We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.  

Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.

FE Podcasts


Check out the most recent episode and schedule of
UPCOMING PODCASTS

© 2024   Created by fireeng.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service