Fire Engineering Training Community

Where firefighters come to talk training

Recently two of my Junior Firefighters registered for a Incident Sagety Offcer class that is bing hosted at my Department and that I am teaching.  The SCFA sent their registrations back stating that they could not take the class because it is not on the "approved" list of classes for Junior Members.  I have called the SCFA and they are planning to get back to me with an answer as to why it is not on the list.

I was just wandering what some of you think of this.  We allow Junior Members to take courses all the way up to Firefighter II and participate in "Live Burns" inside the burn buildings and we do always, SCFA included, stress safety.  So why not be able to take an Incident Safety Officer class?

Views: 261

Replies to This Discussion

I personally think that the ISO class is an officer or officer candidate style class.  That certification would give them the power (or appearance of) being able to throw the red stop flag or serve as an incident aide.  I know none of them would have the experience or knowledge of fire behavior or building construction that I feel would be necessary for them to act as an ISO.  I realize that it is only a minimum level certification but I feel it is too much for a Junior member to grasp.  These folks need to focus on Hose handling, fire behavior, and building construction.  We have Junior Members in my volunteer department, and one of the strongest explorer posts in the state, and I have yet to see one explorer that is ready to take ISO.  

Again just my thoughts.

I called the SCFA to ask them why Junior FF's couldn't take the ISO class, after doing some checking Shane Ray advised me that it would be added the list of acceptable classes for Junior FF's.  Appearantly noone has asked the question before and it was an oversight when creating the list.  It does make sense that if you can take FF2 or NIMS that you be able to take ISO as well.

Jonah,

I agree that ALL training MUST be backed up with experience and on the job training.  I do not think that once anyone completes the ISO class regardless of age is ready to fill that role at an incident, I also think that some people that have never taken the class are ready to fill that role on an incident because they have experience which trumps certifications any day in my book (within reason of course).  I think having some fire behavior knowledge will increase the knowledge of a student taking the ISO class but like NIMS it is not that a Junior would be expected to fill that role but that it would further help to understand where they fit in the bigger picture.  Hopefully it will give them some understanding and help them to look at the big picture and not just thier small part, increase situational awareness.

Jonah Smith said:

I personally think that the ISO class is an officer or officer candidate style class.  That certification would give them the power (or appearance of) being able to throw the red stop flag or serve as an incident aide.  I know none of them would have the experience or knowledge of fire behavior or building construction that I feel would be necessary for them to act as an ISO.  I realize that it is only a minimum level certification but I feel it is too much for a Junior member to grasp.  These folks need to focus on Hose handling, fire behavior, and building construction.  We have Junior Members in my volunteer department, and one of the strongest explorer posts in the state, and I have yet to see one explorer that is ready to take ISO.  

Again just my thoughts.

Absolutely Ron, just because I'm 33 doesn't mean I could be an ISO either.  Glad the SCFA got your issue straightened out.  The big picture often passes the young folks by and you definitely make a good point there.  If you ever need anything give me a holler as we say.

Jonah

Will do.  And feel free to contact me if I can help out with anything. 

Good discussion, I like hearing someone else's perspective on things.

Ron

 

RSS

Policy Page

PLEASE NOTE

The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.

CONTRIBUTORS NOTE

Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.

For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.

We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.  

Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.

FE Podcasts


Check out the most recent episode and schedule of
UPCOMING PODCASTS

Groups

© 2024   Created by fireeng.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service