I've seen this burned to unnburned practice fail too many times. Go to where the fire is. Use the front door. Get to where the fire is. Pushing fire, in my opinion is the lesser of two evils, the other being a delay. Heck there's already been a delay, one that's not your fault; the time it took for discovery, the call for help, the dispatch, and the travel time to get there. Why allow any more delay? Yes; you will push fire some - minimize it by using as straight of a stream as you can. Once you've knocked down enough fire around the point you're going to enter, and you've made entry proper, it isn't any different than if you'd come in from the back, minus the delay. Here are some real life examples of what can go wrong:
The first due engine with a fire at the front of what looked like a single family home went to the back door with the intention of pushing back to front. The home had been modified, creating an in-law apartment that had it's entry at the rear. There was no passage through, short of breaching the wall. The second due of course, followed the first, creating quite a delay as those lines had to be repositioned to the front.
An attempted entry, rear to front of a single family with fire at the front ran into a fox lock on the rear door which was also blocked from the outside by a (big) pile of tires.
At a single family, the on scene resident told the first due the fire was in the rear bedroom, and sure enough it was, as well as a fence, and a large pile of demolition debris which had to be navigated. There was a running garden hose lying in front of the window indicating a delay in notifying while the owner tried to fight the fire. The rear door had a washer and dryer pushed against it in a narrow hallway. The second due found the front door unlocked and were putting water on the fire while the first due was still trying to make entry through the rear. Burglars like back doors, which is why homeowners tend to fortify them.
The decision was made to work rear to front on a fire in a two family upper-lower where the fire was in the front of the upper level. The resident didn't use the rear door and had put a refrigerator in front of the door to keep burglars out. He was found at the front door. He would have been found immediately if the first due had gone that way. Ironically, he might have made it out by himself if he hadn't blocked his own route out the back.
I'm not saying working burned to unburned doesn't work, but it is fraught with all kinds of possibilities for creating a delay in the main objectives - Locate confine extinguish. TJP
BTW, Ricky, usually the truckies will enter the same way as the engine guys went in. There are sometimes valid reasons for them to enter a different way, but usually they will enter whatever way we enter. My line of thinking on this is that searching from area of greatest victim peril (where the fire is) to area of least victim peril (where the fire is not) gives potential victims their best chances. Likewise, ventilating where the fire is makes for the quickest extinguishment. Thats why most texts signify the order of concern in the same way - people in the most peril are 1. in the fire area. 2.above the fire area. 3. on either side of the fire area. 4.below the fire area. This applies especially to apartment buildings. TJP