Tags:
Todd,
We have some of the same fights; I'm not sure what state you are in but here in NY we are an OSHA adapted state and like Bobby said these requirements are clearly spelled out in OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134. We do have a Hasidic Jewish community in the county where I am also a volunteer. They basically have few members that were cleared by the head rabbi to shave. Most of the interior fighting is done by an AMA neighboring department. Now does this always happen; NO; I have video proof; but that is the way it works on paper. Your basic dilemma is the infighting; this has a real simple solution; it’s an OSHA regulation and a NFPA recommendation which is strictly for the safety if the members. You should emphasize this in your training. Because I would not what it sit in a court room and explain why I ignored OSHA and NFPA. Especially in NY; we already have case law that shows you can be convicted for negligence for not following NFPA 1403. Hope this helps your problem,
Chris
Tim, well said.
-Also, to many people often overlook, either by accident or design, the fact that NFPA and OSHA are recommendations only until something happens requiring an investigation by the federal government; ie serious injuries or line of duty death. Then, a beautiful thing happens- all those recommendations become "measurable and enforceable standards violation of which results in monetary fines and/or criminal charges.
-Dont think so? Then you have not been paying attention.
C Whitby said:Todd,
We have some of the same fights; I'm not sure what state you are in but here in NY we are an OSHA adapted state and like Bobby said these requirements are clearly spelled out in OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134. We do have a Hasidic Jewish community in the county where I am also a volunteer. They basically have few members that were cleared by the head rabbi to shave. Most of the interior fighting is done by an AMA neighboring department. Now does this always happen; NO; I have video proof; but that is the way it works on paper. Your basic dilemma is the infighting; this has a real simple solution; it’s an OSHA regulation and a NFPA recommendation which is strictly for the safety if the members. You should emphasize this in your training. Because I would not what it sit in a court room and explain why I ignored OSHA and NFPA. Especially in NY; we already have case law that shows you can be convicted for negligence for not following NFPA 1403. Hope this helps your problem,
Chris
-Many of the responses to this question, here and everywhere else it is discussed, are largely just opinion based when the inescapable fact of the matter is that all firefighters are made aware of the grooming standards before they are hired. If you are not happy with the grooming policy simple- don't become a firefighter.
-The grooming policy stems not from the para militaristic environment that we work in but rather is soundly based in safety testing and performance standards. Can people pass the fit test should they choose to wear a beard? Yes. Is it safe? The answer is an unqualified NO! The potential for compromise in dynamic events is deemed unnecessary and extraordinary.
-Still don't like the answer? Design a better mouse trap.
-Signed, a mustache wearing Brother.
Ive wrote on this subject before when someone asked why they could not wear their beard as it was part of their religion. The reason was simple rules and regulations for SAFETY reasons are written in black and white and if ignored by the fire service or firefighters them selves, we wont be able to keep protecting our members when they dont want to help themselves.
Here in Canada (Where the igloos are) we too have the same rules. However I will say when it comes to the mustache you are not breaking the rules it states no hair will interfer with the seal of the facepeice. So for a chief to state no one is allowed facial hair is simply wrong. Is it in writing? Is it a SOG. If it is then follow it if not ask why.
So this is what the US OSHA says:
Facepiece seal protection.
1910.134(g)(1)(i)
The employer shall not permit respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have:
1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A)
Facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interferes with valve function; or
So explain where it states a mustache is not allowed. So if the Mustache is neatly trimmed and does not interfer with the face seal the problem is what? And yes the who cares attidude needs to Stop. Who cares? howabout the firefighters that are dying from cancers ask them and their familes who cares????
On the fire ground we talk about COMMEN SENSE.....I think it comes into place here as well
Stay Safe.
Wayne
The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.
Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.
For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.
We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.
Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.
Check out the most recent episode and schedule of UPCOMING PODCASTS
45 members
116 members
62 members
73 members
166 members
65 members
277 members
510 members
10 members
106 members
© 2024 Created by fireeng. Powered by
FE Home | Product Center | Training | Zones | Fire-EMS | Firefighting | Apparatus | Health/Safety | Leadership | Prevention | Rescue |