Not to be overly dramatic, but to me, fire attack is combat. Not much different than any other type of fight. My intention is to present an overwhelming force that ends the fight quickly and in my favor. This isn’t to be confused with fighting sports. In the sporting environment, it’s often my turn, your turn, then my turn, and so on. As my favorite defensive instructor says, “In a real fight, it’s my turn, my turn and my turn.” The enemy never gets a chance beyond the ambush! Also,…
ContinueAdded by Eddie Buchanan on December 24, 2016 at 11:31am — No Comments
We are learning that the fireground is more complex than we had previously understood, and we probably still don’t know the half of it. While the recommendations for tactical changes that have arisen from ongoing fire dynamics research have spawned the most discussion amongst members of our profession, the raw information alone was revolutionary in its own right, even absent the practical applications that followed. Flow paths, smoke as fuel, and the (actual) effects of hose…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on December 12, 2016 at 7:08am — No Comments
From my perspective - that being someone who entered the fire service just as the era of "surround and drown" was being replaced by the "get in and hit it up close" approach - the most immediate and practical operational change inspired by fire dynamics research is the early application of water. While the recommendation to delay ventilation also has significant benefits - and loud critics - “opening up”, especially vertically, was a tactic that many of us who worked in small departments…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on November 7, 2016 at 7:30am — No Comments
In an example of how far the arguments against the MFA approach have devolved, we now find ourselves facing critics within the fire service who complain that our tactics have become too safe! More specifically, they contend that the focus has been taken away from rescuing victims and protecting property to instead maintaining our own safety. Having been an outspoken advocate of these principles for over…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on August 15, 2016 at 7:05am — 2 Comments
Continuing my theme of rebutting the new reasons traditionalists are coming up with to avoid changing their approach to firefighting, given that many of its original justifications have been effectively disproven, this post will focus on the air flow component of the "How to Control Combustion" equation, commonly referred to as tactical ventilation. I addressed the resistance to the use of exterior hose streams in MFA #32: Changing the Rules - New excuses for old habits (at…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on July 18, 2016 at 6:50am — No Comments
There has been a steady increase in the fire service’s acknowledgment of the validity of the information provided by recent fire dynamics research, with references to the new understanding now appearing in articles, training materials, and after-case reports (not to mention the occasional blog). Flow paths, smoke as fuel, wind effects, the inability to push fire with straight streams, and the rapid increase in combustion that results from ventilation are all concepts that have been…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on July 5, 2016 at 11:22am — 2 Comments
*Aggressive Interior Attack
At every structure fire that is not declared a defensive situation, and after we get past the currently controversial intervention choices (vent, flow water, both, or neither), firefighters of all tactical persuasions will then need to enter the building in order to complete the tasks that remain (search, extinguishment, ventilation, overhaul, salvage). It is at that point that the traditional and modern fire attack (MFA) methods converge,…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on June 30, 2016 at 6:49am — No Comments
In the ongoing debate over structural firefighting tactics in the era of fire dynamics enlightenment, the topic inspiring particularly passionate sentiment does not so much regard tactics themselves, but the sequence in which they are performed. Regardless if your belief is that almost all firefighting should be performed indoors and that the only valuable exterior action is ventilation, or if you have embraced all or some of the fire behavior research findings that…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on June 15, 2016 at 6:41am — No Comments
Winding up my treatise on ventilation in the modern era, this fifth and final (for now) blog on the topic will focus on the practical changes we need to make for controlling the air flow to a fire, as inspired by our new knowledge of its effects. Links to sources for additional information on specific techniques will be provided at the conclusion of this installment. Previous postings have discussed how fire dynamics research findings have required us to re-visit our use of this tactic,…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on May 23, 2016 at 5:43am — No Comments
This is the fourth installment in a series exploring the impact of our new understanding of the effects of ventilation on compartment fires, and suggesting modifications to that tactic that incorporate that knowledge. Rather than fill this space with links, any reader wishing to catch up by binge-reading my prior posts on this topic should start at…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on May 10, 2016 at 6:34pm — No Comments
Previous postings on this subject addressed the need to reassess our approach to ventilation as a fire control tactic in light of our newfound awareness of the significant increase in heat production it can cause (http://community.fireengineering.com/profiles/blog/show?id=1219672%3ABlogPost%3A626990) and then provided an alternative basis for categorizing the different circumstances in…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on April 27, 2016 at 7:14am — No Comments
The new information produced by recent fire science research demands a significant reassessment of the role of ventilation for fire suppression. MFA #25 The Ventilation Revolution - New information brings new understanding (http://community.fireengineering.com/profiles/blog/show?xg_source=activity&id=1219672%3ABlogPost%3A626990) provided the introduction…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on April 19, 2016 at 7:32am — No Comments
(Author’s Note: As I was writing this series of posts, there appeared here on the Fire Engineering Training Community another blog on this same subject by Nicholas Papa [http://community.fireengineering.com/profiles/blog/show?id=1219672%3ABlogPost%3A627047]. Obviously, I decided to publish mine anyway, as there are enough facets to this discussion…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on April 14, 2016 at 7:30am — 1 Comment
Good manners can be deadly, as in taking the time to excuse yourself before grabbing someone as they are about to step off a curb into the path of a moving car. In the ongoing debates regarding firefighting tactics, there is a tendency to avoid offending and alienating fellow firefighters by describing those based on the recent research as “another tool in the toolbox”, and “something to think about”. While not inaccurate descriptions, these new “tools” render many of the others obsolete,…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on March 15, 2016 at 6:50am — No Comments
A riddle: What feature does almost every dwelling already have, can prevent death despite a raging fire, occupants often neglect to put into service, but which firefighters can utilize to improve conditions?
Answer: A door.
Recent fire dynamics research has lead to recommendations for dramatic changes in our approach to structure fires, with debates and arguments…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on February 10, 2016 at 7:55am — No Comments
We in the fire service are fond of initials. They are used both as abbreviated identifiers (e.g., BC, LT, EMS, FADO, AFA, MVC) and/or shortened versions of unwieldy terms (e.g., IDLH, BLEVE, SCBA), forming the type of private, insider language common of all professions. They have also proven to be valuable memory aids, helping us to learn and recall the components and steps of complex processes. For instance, the myriad and extensive considerations that should be included in…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on January 19, 2016 at 10:00am — No Comments
The end of the calendar year brings with it a natural tendency to look back on what has been accomplished, and ahead to what still needs to be done. I’ve been commenting for the past half year on the significant shift in fire dynamics understanding and resulting tactical modifications that the North American fire service is undergoing, and I would like to share a few reflections and predictions on that broad and controversial topic.
Despite my demonstrated interest in the…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on January 4, 2016 at 9:30am — No Comments
When considering the need to modify traditional tactics that many believe still work quite well, thank you very much, it’s important to think back on the reasons behind the new recommendations. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) became involved in our business at the request of the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the process of the latter’s investigation of firefighter Line of Duty Deaths (LODDs). When some fatal events could not be…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on December 29, 2015 at 9:39am — No Comments
Continuing resistance to the idea of applying water to a structure fire from the exterior comes from those who believe that a fire attack via an interior route is inherently better. It's not. We all used to think so, and it was the approach taught and practiced for decades, but now we know better. The NIST and UL studies have shown that flowing water into a compartment containing fire only makes things better, making the most direct route to the fire the best choice.
I was once a…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on December 18, 2015 at 8:00am — No Comments
Steam is both the firefighter’s enemy and ally. It can burn us by penetrating anything that does not have a moisture barrier, such as our hoods, or by entering any gaps in our gear that expose skin. There is even research ongoing at NIST to determine if it can get past intact PPE, or be formed when our sweat vaporizes (http://www.nist.gov/pml/div685/grp01/firefighters-steam-burns-20150427.cfm). On the…
ContinueAdded by Mark J. Cotter on December 8, 2015 at 8:43am — No Comments
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2005
1999
The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.
Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.
For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.
We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.
Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.
Check out the most recent episode and schedule of UPCOMING PODCASTS
45 members
116 members
62 members
73 members
166 members
65 members
277 members
510 members
10 members
106 members
© 2024 Created by fireeng. Powered by
FE Home | Product Center | Training | Zones | Fire-EMS | Firefighting | Apparatus | Health/Safety | Leadership | Prevention | Rescue |