When I teach, I usually bring up the point that “there is always more than one right way to fight a fire and conversely, more than one wrong way to fight a fire”. What works (or worked) in Toledo may not work in New York and vice versa.
In my third book, “Searching Smarter” (published by Fire Engineering/Pennwell, 2011), in Chapter 2, I discuss the four types of search I am aware of; those being “Standard Search”, “Team Search”, “Vent Enter Search (VES)” and the “Oriented Search”.
There can be variations of some of these, but the basic premise behind each remains the same. As an example, I am aware of two types of VES. One is the original one-person VES. I my opinion this form is very dangerous, violates most “rules” of search and firefighter safety including “two-in/ two-out” and should be done only in extreme, probably once in a lifetime circumstances. The other type of VES is the “Oriented VES” or “Two-Person VES”. The principle and evolutions are basically the same with the difference that one firefighter (the searcher) vents, enters and searches a sleeping area while another firefighter (the oriented person) remains outside on the porch roof, at the window on a ladder or on the ground outside the window, to assure the searchers safety and assist if an actual rescue is made. This two-person VES is an acceptable method of search in my opinion. It is extremely handy in rural America where staffing may be low.
I would like to start some exercises (simulations) in the next few posts and discuss for each situation, what type of search you would employ. At the end of each post I will ask some questions I would like you to discuss.
Click the link below to view the simulation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd8etcl9vqg&feature=youtu.be
Below is a close proximity of the floor plan.
It's your department with your staffing procedures and equipment. As the video goes, what you see is what you get. Its' 6:30 a.m. on a Sunday.
1) What type of search would you use and basically how would that search be conducted?
2) Where would you enter the structure?
Please post your answers and comments in the Comment Section.
Comment
Thanks Jon for being the first person with the courage to answer. How many people would you expect to do the VES technique? 1, 2 or more? Although not a Search Technique, if you were to use PPA, where would you put your ventilation exit opening?
Again, thanks.
I would definitely do a 360 before making a surefire decision, but from what I can tell I looks like a kitchen fire. I cant tell if there are any cars in the driveway, but if I knew for sure there was a life hazard, I would use a VES technique starting with bedroom #1 and working my way across. Although with a situation like that, positive pressure attack might be the best way to help these victims out.
The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.
Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.
For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.
We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.
Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.
Check out the most recent episode and schedule of UPCOMING PODCASTS
45 members
116 members
62 members
73 members
166 members
65 members
277 members
510 members
10 members
106 members
© 2024 Created by fireeng. Powered by
FE Home | Product Center | Training | Zones | Fire-EMS | Firefighting | Apparatus | Health/Safety | Leadership | Prevention | Rescue |
You need to be a member of Fire Engineering Training Community to add comments!
Join Fire Engineering Training Community