Fire Engineering Training Community

Where firefighters come to talk training

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Technical Committee on Ambulances balloting this week failed by one vote to move a draft “NFPA 1917, Standard for Automotive Ambulances” forward into the review and public comment process that would have rolled an ambulance design standard out the door during mid-2012.

At issue was inclusion of several AMD (Automobile Manufacturers Division of the National Truck Equipment Association) testing standards incorporated into the draft document without copyright release. While most likely an oversight by the non-legal eagles on the 1917 technical committee, redacting the AMD material from the draft standard (on the advice of NFPA counsel) left some rather large holes.

Had the draft been approved and forwarded this week to the NFPA Standards Council, it would have been released for public comment, closing November 23, 2010. Responses to comments would have been published June 24, 2011 opening an additional comment on the comments period ending August 30, 2011. A final draft would have been published February 24, 2012 and, depending on receipt of any official objections, have taken effect in either July or August 2012.

No word on how long the process will now be delayed, but returning the 1917 draft to committee will likely result in resolution of some significant gaps between the current General Services Administration (GSA) “triple K” or KKK ambulance p... and other ambulance design or purchasing standards, including AMD. Prior to the smack down resulting from this week’s failed balloting, it appeared the committee intended to use public commentary to steer several controversial decisions. Stay tuned for word on when the draft 1917 document might be resuscitated. The feds have made it abundantly clear that, if and when, an NFPA Ambulance Design Standard hits the pavement, they'll cease issuing and updating triple K.

Mike McEvoy,
EMS Editor – Fire Engineering magazine
NFPA 1917 Technical Committee Member

Views: 379


You need to be a member of Fire Engineering Training Community to add comments!

Join Fire Engineering Training Community

Comment by Tim Crowley on September 13, 2010 at 3:23pm

Policy Page


The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.


Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.

For vetted content, please go to

We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.  

Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail

FE Podcasts

Check out the most recent episode and schedule of


© 2024   Created by fireeng.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service