The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.
Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.
For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.
We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.
Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.
Check out the most recent episode and schedule of UPCOMING PODCASTS
45 members
116 members
62 members
73 members
166 members
65 members
277 members
510 members
10 members
106 members
© 2024 Created by fireeng. Powered by
FE Home | Product Center | Training | Zones | Fire-EMS | Firefighting | Apparatus | Health/Safety | Leadership | Prevention | Rescue |
Comment Wall (1 comment)
You need to be a member of Fire Engineering Training Community to add comments!
Join Fire Engineering Training Community
definitely understand about the radio confusion. While i fortunately have not had to do this in a real situation and our dept has not adopted this three frequency procedure yet, i was very pleased with the outcomes during our simulated drills. In the chaotic initial moments of a mayday, it is of the utmost importance to keep one's head together, but the heads of everyone else may be a different story thus the radio channelo confusion. We are going to explore it further and see how it goes and hopefully never need it. One thig is 4 certain, if u do not control the communications, it is tough to control your people be safe and thanx 4 the feedback
aa