Created from the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, the National Fire Academy (originally envisioned as the National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control) was charged with training fire, and now EMS, personnel, developing model curricula, develop entrance and promotional examination materials, and encourage fire prevention and detection for builders, contractors, and architects. Since that time, the NFA has created and distributed a wide variety of training programs and made a significant contribution to the reduction of risk through training and education. Its flagship programs, Managing Officer and Executive Fire Officer Programs are geared towards training company and executive officers, with the Executive Fire Officer Program requiring a significant research paper. Other programs include community risk reduction, fire cause and origin, fire codes and standards, training, EMS, safety, hazardous materials, planning and information management, and incident management.
It is my humble opinion that the NFA could leverage these programs to create safer communities by creating voluntary training pathways that include the include a capstone project. I am proposing that the fire and emergency services community come together and advocate for such a program. This program would link courses both in a single curricula area and across curricula area and require that participants complete the courses then develop, implement, and report on a capstone project to address an issue within their local community. This would improve the return on investment for communities and the NFA and create a national level program incubator to address hazards. The reporting mechanism can then serve as a repository of successful and unsuccessful projects, providing potential solutions for communities which may be facing similar challenges. It is my belief that the introduction of such a program would significantly reduce community risk on a national level within 10 – 15 years, resulting in safer communities, reduced cost associated with response and recovery from incidents, and improved health and safety of emergency responders.
What are your thoughts? Is the nation ready for a proactive program that improves safety while keeping costs down?
The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.
Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.
For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.
We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.
Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.
Check out the most recent episode and schedule of UPCOMING PODCASTS
45 members
116 members
62 members
73 members
166 members
65 members
277 members
510 members
10 members
106 members
Switch to the Mobile Optimized View
© 2024 Created by fireeng. Powered by
FE Home | Product Center | Training | Zones | Fire-EMS | Firefighting | Apparatus | Health/Safety | Leadership | Prevention | Rescue |
You need to be a member of Fire Engineering Training Community to add comments!
Join Fire Engineering Training Community