Carbon Monoxide Levels

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by dan on January 16, 2012 at 5:24pm

Eric,

 

There is a great deal of new information out there.......If you go to the link below you will find OSHA and NIOSH guidelines

 

This is cut and pasted from the website below.......PLEASE CHECK TO SEE IF THERE IS NEWER INFO AVAILABLE BUT THESE ARE STILL VALID.

 

EXPOSURE LIMITS

* OSHA PEL

The current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) for carbon monoxide is 50 parts per million (ppm) parts of air (55 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m(3))) as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) concentration [29 CFR Table Z-1].

* NIOSH REL

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has established a recommended exposure limit (REL) for carbon monoxide of 35 ppm (40 mg/m(3)) as an 8-hour TWA and 200 ppm (229 mg/m(3)) as a ceiling [NIOSH 1992].

* ACGIH TLV

The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has assigned carbon monoxide a threshold limit value (TLV) of 25 ppm (29 mg/m(3)) as a TWA for a normal 8-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek [ACGIH 1994, p. 15].

* Rationale for Limits

The NIOSH limit is based on the risk of cardiovascular effects [NIOSH

The ACGIH limit is based on the risk of elevated carboxyhemoglobin levels [ACGIH 1991, p. 229]. http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/healthguidelines/carbonmonoxide/recognitio...

 

Be safe! When in doubt wear your SCBA.....A very good resource for HCN and CO  ..........go to Peoples Burn Foundation and they have training videos that are first class with the latest information....... REMEMBER  TO READ ABOUT HCN SINCE THERE IS NEWER INFORMATION STATING HCN IS NOW CONSIDERED MORE DEADLY THAN CO.....AND THE TWO COMBINED ARE VERY SERIOUS ISSUES........AND WE KNOW THEY ARE BOTH PRESENT AT EVERY FIRE.

Dan

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arthur S. Collatz on January 16, 2012 at 8:13pm

Eric,

     Danny gave all the technical info. So I will just give you my opinion. Why would you want to breathe anything other than AIR? We have SCBA's so why not use them, the more we use them the more comfortable we get with them, its like training.

I know SCBA's can be hot and fog up and all the other excuses we have for not wearing them, however why not err on the side of safety.

Others in the department may disagree and say not to worry its just a routine call, that never happens here, it always happens to the other guy..... well to me, you are the other guy, so please err on the side of safety and wear your SCBA if in doubt. Don't make me call your mom!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Larry Lasich on June 1, 2012 at 9:00am

Eric,

is your question; during overhaul, when should your crews to be on air?  The answer to that should be, ALWAYS.  The stuff that is killing you after a fire is not CO,  it's nano particles, hydrogen cyanide, acrolein, phosgene and a bunch of other cancer causers, blood agents and asphyxiants.  None of these are going to set off a basic 4 gas monitor, so assume that bad stuff is present and stay safe.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Patrick Vaughn on June 6, 2012 at 7:09pm

The "Consumer Product Safety Commision" published a guide for responding to residential CO alarms. It was created for the First responder and is quite informative. http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/coguide.pdf
I have attached the link. you will find the document was published in 02 however the information is still relevant today. Everyone else here has also given some spot on info as well! 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michael Bricault (ret) on September 18, 2012 at 10:01pm

-Eric, we use the same numbers you mentioned, 35 PPM, this level is in accordance with OSHA. Anything below this is generally regarded as safe. Remember that the amount of time exposed also factors specifically into the established exposure equation. 

-Not sure I agree with Larry as "always" is impractical and unnecessary when one considers that there are technically "unsafe" levels in your home when cooking supper with the windows closed.

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion