Fire Engineering Training Community

Where firefighters come to talk training

From EngineHouseTraining,LLC

 

With today’s fire service being cut to the bone, fire departments are finding themselves short handed in every aspect of our day to day functions.  This affects how we operate and it may require us to change how we perform some tasks.

In other areas fire departments have been running “short” since their inception: 3-man crews.  They have never had the man power to separate functions like fire attack and search.  They have always had to  and continue to adapt to the resources that are available.

In my part of the country, the second example is by and large the most prevelant. The majority of departments that are not volunteer operate with 3 person crews. That includes the driver.  This obviously creates some challenges and some adaptability to each situation.

One area is searching buildings.  The best way to protect victims and icnrease their survivability is to improve the atmosphere by putting out the fire and venting to let toxic gas, heat and smoke to be evacuated out of the building.

However, there are many instances that require us to physically find and remove victims from burning buildings.

Many areas are seeing large homes that are difficult to use traditional wall searches because we are not getting to the middle of the room.  This becomes a challenge also due to the many doors and additional rooms that these buildings contain.

One method that we teach and practice is searching off of the hose line with a length of webbing.  The initial crew can stretch a line and search at the same time. Is it a little slower? Sure, but they can perform both functions effectively if they train properly.  What is important is that they understand that they must put out the fire if they come to it first and remove the victim if they find them first.

When searching with a line one firefighter can tie a girth hitch onto the hose and advance with it. When they get to an area large or cut up, they extend off of the hose line while holding the webbing and staying in voice contact with the nozzle firefighter.

Depending on the length of the webbing the search firefighter can cover a lot of area in a very short time without ever losing contact with the hose.  The nozzle firefighter can continue to watch for changing conditions and has the ability to push back fire if encountered.

This is just one method that can be used in these instances.  You must train and practice to your department’s guidelines. If you have techniques and methods that you use, please share them.

Stay safe and train often.

Views: 147

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

-Your comments. "The initial crew can stretch a line and search at the same time. Is it a little slower? Sure, but they can perform both functions effectively if they train properly."

-I understand that this technique is born out of staffing shortages. I get that. But, there is no way that one crew of three firefighters can perform fire attack and perform a search simultaneously. The crucial time component is lost. Period.

-How many members are we talking about in this hypothetical company? 6? 4? 3? Less? How many do we really have inside? Who's running the pumps? 3 is the number you use in the example. What about 2 In/2 Out? The only excusing exception to which is a know trapped occupant and in that case rescue is the full priority.

-What you describe here is an overburdened, slow moving attack crew looking for fire that will remove a body should it be encountered while they search for fire. That is not a primary search for life, any "rescue" is accidentally performed by an attack team that has stumbled on to a body. Neither is this even remotely a thorough, effective search for life.

-Firefighters advancing a hand line are slowed by the hose to such a point as to loose any component of a search for life, reducing the outcome to nothing more than a body recovery. A true searching compony is not encumbered by a hose and therefore has the ability of very fluid, very rapid movement throughout the occupancy.

-I too learned this webbing technique and have found it to be an idea that works well in training and absolutely does not translate to real life. The lack of visibility, coupled with the lose of tactile sense and fine motor skill related to gloves, gear, obstructions, debris and basic biological reactions make the girth hitch almost agonizingly permanent once applied to the line.

-The webbing idea, though seemingly conceptually basically sound in theory, actually slows the dual "attack/search" team even further so as to unnecessarily complicate the operations exponentially. So how do we address this situation?

-Lets look at a few of John Norman's principles. 

1. When sufficient manpower is not available to perform rescue and suppression simultaneously then RESCUE must be given priority. Rereading this section eve has a perfect example that is very close to your hypothetical scenario. Chief Norman's logical solution dispels the idea of dual function tasks.

2. When sufficient manpower is not available to perform all necessary tasks then first perform those tasks that protect the greatest number of human lives.

-Jason, your scenario is interesting in that it deliberately presents distractors, like a test. The distractors are potential victims, hose lines and webbing techniques. The key to the riddle is in the limited manpower who can only physically do so much.

-If there is an Urgent or High Rescue Profile in the scenario then search and rescue operations must be given priority. Period. See Norman's principles above. If attacking the fire will protect the greatest number of lives then attack the fire. But again the rub lies in the ability of being able to knock down the fire while simultaneously protecting those that are trapped from everything. While the fire is knocked down will the victims continue to be exposed to heat, smoke, searing steam and thermal inversions from suppression and all the poisons byproducts already in the atmosphere? There is no success in suppressing the fire only to find out the victims died from the byproducts of the fire and suppression efforts. The simple truth is that the fire may have to be ignored for a few precious minutes... that's reality.

-Limited manpower arriving at a working fire with trapped victims? That's an easy solution given Norman's 5 principles. It will take disciplined firefighters and a competent officer to follow the principles and avoid knee jerk reactionary firefighting and the temptation to overload the two or three members with additional time consuming tasks like the webbing technique but that is true professionalism. 

-When I first read the blog I thought of something I heard a while ago about interesting ideas and reality.  "Looks good on paper but then again so did communism".

I have always read Normans teachings and have several of his books.

I agree, if you have limited manpower and a confirmed threat to life, than that manpower should be used for search and rescue.  Its a tough call to make for an officer arriving first on scene with no reports of anyone inside, and you only have 3 firefighters and a pump operator.  What do you do?  Use the crew to stretch a line and attack the fire or do a quick search first and hope more manpower gets there fast?  Like mentioned though, sometimes the best thing for any trapped victims is extinguishing the fire and venting for life, if the fire is small enough.  But if you have a large working fire in multiple rooms than I would probably have the crew do a search just to be sure.  By then the building is probably a loss to the insurance companies anyway so look for the vics and feel better knowing that you looked and made sure. 

Buildings can be rebuilt, but lives can not be replaced, theirs or ours.  Sometimes a good officer needs to say "We lossed this one and Im not loosing any life to save the building". 

Good points and a good discussion to have.

Stay Safe.

 

-One of the things many people overlook when advocating knocking the fire down first is that the victim continues to be exposed to the heat, smoke, poisonous gases and superheated air, not to mention the resulting thermal inversions and searing steam production that results from suppression. 

-Put the fire out and generally, as a general rule, things generally tend to get better... until the victim dies.  Put the fire out and things get better only if you can protect the trapped victims from the fire and the byproducts of combustion, the suppression efforts and their resulting byproducts.

-When there is an Urgent or High Rescue Profile on scene all actions on scene must further the rescue of those that are trapped. 

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Policy Page

PLEASE NOTE

The login above DOES NOT provide access to Fire Engineering magazine archives. Please go here for our archives.

CONTRIBUTORS NOTE

Our contributors' posts are not vetted by the Fire Engineering technical board, and reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors. Anyone is welcome to participate.

For vetted content, please go to www.fireengineering.com/issues.

We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our community policy page.  

Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peter.prochilo@clarionevents.com.

FE Podcasts


Check out the most recent episode and schedule of
UPCOMING PODCASTS

Groups

© 2024   Created by fireeng.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service