Most people, when asked this question, will normally think about how much weight they can lift or if the are overweight or not. I argue that being "firefighter fit (fire rescue fit) is much more than that. You may be able to lift heavy weights but that doesn't necessarily mean that you are that strong. When talking about Firefighter fitness you are only as strong as your "weakest" part. You see true strength comes in the form of functional fitness, fitness that can be applied and used in fireground situations, not just in a gym.
We all know that firefighting is a physical job, we need to be strong, have good muscular endurance, great core and grip strength and must be able to recover quickly. The challenge that we (as fire rescue athletes) face is trying to identify how to functionally test fire rescue athletes? There are so many components of the body that must work efficiently in order to do the everyday tasks of the Fire Rescue Athlete. How do you define firefighter fit? What tests do you think are good measures for our job?
Michael Bricault (ret)
-We have discontinued the Combat Challenge and replaced it with the CPAT for approximately five years now. In my opinion the CPAT seems to be a much better gauge of the overall fitness level required for professional firefighters than the Combat Challenge.
-I am a firm believer that firefighters must regard themselves as akin to a professional athlete and maintain the fitness levels necessary for this very special work. Cardio and weight training are a must; there is no excuse for being overweight and out of shape in this business. I still get a good chuckle out of the "biggie" sized fireman who thinks his "size" directly translates to strength... not even close to understanding just how diluted they are.
-I also believe, having witnessed some of the new training regimes being administered around the country, that there are far to many "Training Academies" out there who's young instructors have begun taking things way to far with new recruits. These new "self appointed bad a**" instructors have forgotten (or don't care) that we are training professional firefighters not commandos or Seals; and our training must be reflective of the nature of these job requirements in order for our people to perform to the expectations of firefighting.
Jun 20, 2012
Jonah Smith
I believe that intense events that involve short periods of recovery are good measures. We are placed into intense physical exertion and then must recover quickly before the next task is done. I believe the CPAT is a good measure in some ways, but I also believe the FFCC has some redeeming qualities as well. The muscular endurance and strength must be maintained in addition to the cardiovascular in order for one to be sucessful in our trade. Strength is great but you have to maintain it over a period during a fire incident.
Jul 3, 2012
Eric C.
May 23, 2015