Comment
Comment by Jake Beck on April 22, 2011 at 9:25am Brian -
Forgive me if I am ignorant, but I am having a hard time understanding your intent.
If you know and understand PPA, then you realize that PPA was being used correctly in the video. Whether or not you agree w/ the use of PPA has very little bearing on this specific video and your OP.
If you want to get into the pros and cons of PPA, we can do that. I am just wildly confused by the intent of your two posts.
Stay safe,
Jake
Comment by Brian Arnold on April 22, 2011 at 8:24am
Comment by Jake Beck on April 21, 2011 at 8:52pm G******** Brian -
I am sorry if the content or the title are misleading. Exactly 31 burns were conducted in this structure and 100% of those utilized PPA. Perhaps that was not depicted very well in the video?
Myself and the other instructor are recent graduates of Garica and Kauffmann's "Positive Pressure Instructors Academy". Not to mention we have used this tactic extensively for the last 10 or so years.
Stay safe,
Jake
Comment by Brian Arnold on April 21, 2011 at 5:05pm Nice video but I didn't see any PPA and very little PPV. The title of the video is pretty misleading.

We are excited to have you participate in our discussions and interactive forums. Before you begin posting, please take a moment to read our policy page HERE. -- Bobby Halton
Be Alert for Spam
We actively monitor the community for spam, however some does slip through. Please use common sense and caution when clicking links. If you suspect you've been hit by spam, e-mail peterp@pennwell.com.
Does your fire department have a policy concerning working above or below truss assemblies involved in fire? CLICK HERE to send us your reply.
© 2013 Created by fireeng.

| Home | Buyer's Guide | Training | Zones | EMS | Firefighting | Apparatus | Health/Safety | Leadership | Prevention | Rescue | Community | Mobile |

You need to be a member of Fire Engineering Training Community to add comments!
Join Fire Engineering Training Community